INTRODUCTION
The information technology wave has hit all sectors in which the banking sector has not been left behind. With online industry becoming more convenient and helpful, many users are turning to online banking to provide for their needs (Bouteille and Coogan, 2013). One platform that has become popular in the online banking sector is the online/marketplace platform in which lenders and borrowers are linked through an online platform. This platform has proved useful as it is not only innovative but provides a new method to fund borrowers with credit (King, 2010). This service has become widespread as it not only impacts the borrowers but provides a lending experience that traditional banking do not offer. However, this platform is different from the traditional banking system and offers great possibilities for the future. This paper is going to discuss the new model of online marketplace and how different it is from conventional banking together with the financial risks involved. In addition to that, the paper will analyse whether such a system can weather a downturn and offer recommendations on some regulatory frameworks that can be helpful in online/marketplace lending practices.
- Describe the new market model of online/marketplace lending, as discussed in the article. What are the major differences from conventional bank lending?
The online /market place lending is a new lending system in which borrowers and lenders can access and provide loans through an online platform in which their profiles can be viewed (King, 2010). After borrowers have made their requests, different lenders can fund the project since the amount the borrower has requested is displayed on the platform more like online shopping in which one picks the item that has attracted them the most (Wack, 2015). Companies which provide the platform organize the entire process in which the application of loans is screened together with the risk associated with the borrower. In addition to that, such platforms ensure that the money borrowed is sent back to the lenders in due time.
In addition to that, some online/marketplace lending do not offer the investor the chance to select the type of loans they would like to invest in. Such platforms offers a general guideline in which the loans are already classified based on the risk tolerance. These platforms offer loans which are in turn paid back with a certain amount of interest (Zhang et al, 2016). Therefore, such a platform can be considered as one which matches borrowers with loans that lack security from their prospective lenders. The borrower will receive their money after the platform has carried a borrower assessment. This means that unlike other businesses which rely on the difference on the amount of money collected from the borrower, the platforms mainly rely on the services they provide as they generally link up borrowers and lenders.
The other characteristic of the online/market place lending is the credit scoring techniques that are used by the platform coupled with their operations which are based online (Bouteille and Coogan, 2013). Their credit scoring is mainly applied in the extension or improvement of credit that is offered to both the businesses and individuals. The main application process for these online/marketplace lending platforms. The first step which is the loan application and credit evaluation is one in which potential borrowers fill in both their personal and financial information that is provided by the platform (Bouteille and Coogan, 2013). After the form is fully filled and sent through the internet, the company will review the information provided and gauge whether the borrower is worthy of credit and verify the information given through screening. The screening process involves using information from employers. In a scenario where information from employers is not available, then they will turn to other sources such as previous credit score used (Wack, 2015). If a borrower is found eligible, then the interest rates are sent out to them. In some cases, the rates are negotiable to both the borrower and the lender. It is important to note that the interest rate that the borrower receives includes the service charge of the online platform (King, 2010). This is because such platforms only make money through the services they provide and not through the interest rates like banks. If the borrower is satisfied with the terms and conditions that are given to them, the loan is then disbursed to them.
There are various differences that exist between conventional banking and online/marketplace lending. The first difference is that banks have specialized to act as an intercessor between the borrower and the saver (Zhang et al, 2016). They mainly focus on lending money to borrowers and paying interest to savers and depositors. However, for online/marketplace lending, their main work is to link up the lender and borrower through their online platforms (PWC, 2015).
The second difference is the way in which conventional banks generate their income. Conventional banking mainly put all their risks on their balance sheet in that they balance between the money deposited and the money that they have received as interest (Wack, 2015). However, for thee online platforms, they mainly rely on an external party to take the risk as they do not have the money to lend. They only act as a platform as they do not earn any interest therefore incurring no profit or losses.
The third difference is the fact that conventional banking requires capital all the time in order to absorb the losses that they acquire while for online/marketplace lending, they mainly rely on the amount that they charge for services (Zhang et al, 2016). The last difference is that depositors have limited access and know-how of how the funds they have deposited is used while in online/marketplace lending, the usage of money is transparent to the lenders.
- What kind of financial risks are present in online lending? What could be the effects on an economy’s financial stability, if the practice of marketplace lending substantially increases?
Within the last ten years, there has been numerous discussions on online lending industry, a growing industry which provides end to end loan experience via online delivery (King, 2010). Much has been on its use of technological innovations to expand and simplify the access of capital by consumers, its standpoint on regulation and the threat it possess to the tradition financial firms. One of the financial risks presented include the ability to scale. One of the key financial risk is credit risk through bias recognition (King, 2010). The manner in which online credit institutions provide loans to lenders is quite different from the traditional methods. However, this is not the case with online lending as the consumers are just given loans without much consideration which leads to risk of not paying back and eventually potential liquidity risk.
In addition to that, there exists a volatile investor confidence. Often, an investor driven lensing model depends on the capability of the online lender to attract funning from institutional vendors, financial institutions and venture capitalists (PWC, 2015). However, as the online lending industry has matured and continues to attract funding from the online investment communities, the industry is relatively growing. However, there is concern on investor retention and its effects on an economy’s financial stability, if the practice of marketplace lending substantially increase. Investors are reluctant s there lacks predicable cash flow, increasing competition from the traditional markets and untested credit risk assessments. In addition to that, funding challenges arise from the current activities in pricing and the downgrade reviews of securitization transactions.
Another key factor is that there lack internal control and oversight on the online lending industry (Bouteille and Coogan, 2013). A number of online lenders can easily change the information on their loans so as to make themselves look more attractive. Incidents as such greatly affect investor confidence and the ability of the industry to stabilize due to manipulation. There lacks ways of preventing and monitoring fraud as most of the transactions are carried out online (Bouteille and Coogan, 2013). It is possible for individuals and corporations to put up a fake profile which fits into the credit requirements especially through identity theft. Therefore, this indicates that majority of the online lending companies can be subjected to borrower fraud meaning that it is not a fraud proof business
Risks as such could have effects on an economy’s financial stability, if the practice of marketplace lending substantially increases. This can be attributed mostly to the unregulated and unprotected market. Traditional financial lending firms relied on government regulations and protections which greatly helped them in case of a repeat of the 2007/2008 global financial crisis. (King, 2010).
Therefore, with no regulations, the interest rates could easily go high. When consumers pay less in their interest rates they have more money to spend in the economy and this can easily lead to increased spending in the economy. Eventually productivity and output is increased generally. On the other hand, higher interest rates show that consumers cut on spending as they don’t have a lot of disposable income (King, 2010). In cases when higher interest rates go with increased lending standards from financial institutions there are fewer loans. Consumers cut back on spending which means decreased productivity and the general economy. This can easily lead to the banks crashing and the general economy through the ripple effect. Therefore, this could either go two ways, a good performance on the economy or decreased performance on the economy. Nevertheless, if measures are put in place to control the online lenders, then a positive effect is expected.
iii. As it is stated in the article, the market place bosses believe that “…they can weather a downturn because they do not own the loans they originate”. What is your view of this statement?
In the case of a downturn, the most likely event that the central bank will do is to reduce significantly the interest rates. However, this will have a negative effect on the p2p as most of these online lending platforms have rates that range around 5 percent (King, 2010). This means that they do not have the capacity to move to smaller rates. Since the online lending platform is entirely based on the supply and demand of credit in which the borrowing and lending rates can be altered as one desires, this means that if the platform moves towards zero rates, they will attract money. Such a move is impossible and can only be achieved by the Central Bank in case of a downturn. This means that such platforms are unlikely to survive in the case of a downturn (HM Treasury, 2014).
In addition to that, in a case whereby a downturn would be experienced, this means that the marketplace and online lenders would have to deal with the issue of debt restructuring (King, 2010). Compared to banks, the platform lacks sufficient information about lenders in the banking system. Therefore, for such online lenders to be successful, they have to have such a system in place which is quite a new task to them. This means that banks would flourish in such a scenario since it has in place a permanent system which deals with a downturn. Despite the fact that lenders in the platforms undergo through a vigorous credit check before they are given money, this system does not seem to be as resilient as the bank sector. The transformation of the industry in to as table platform is taking long and seems to be far from reality (HM Treasury, 2014). This is despite the fact that underwriting in the online lending platform is strict and more data options for lenders are being explored.
The rate of growth for online lenders is stagnant and in case of an economic downturn, the lenders would suffer. However, to prepare for this they have to position themselves well in the market with regulatory frameworks that protect both the lender and the creditor (HM Treasury, 2014). This is in terms of the way in which they can handle the evolving financial instability together with building a stable portfolio performance. Unlike banks which have proved to be profitable, these p2p lending platforms have proved to be unstable therefore in the event of a downturn, the pressure would significantly increase (Bouteille and Coogan, 2013).
The last issue to be addressed on why a downturn would significantly affect the p2p lenders is due to the nature of lending in the banking world. Since the financial crisis of 2008, banks have become more careful in relation to who they lend their loan and have significantly cut down their funding (PWC, 2015). This means that as more banks have become strict, borrowers are turning to p2p lenders as a source of credit in which the rates are likely to be pushed up due to the attractiveness of the platform. However, majority of these p2p lenders and online platforms mainly rely on banks for lending. Therefore, in downturn case, banks are likely to pull back from sectors that are more vulnerable like the P2P lenders because they are trying to reduce the risk exposure that they suffered in 2008 (Bouteille and Coogan, 2013). Therefore, such a system would likely collapse in the event of a downturn since the platforms are lending businesses that have existing overdrafts and do not have the ability to survive in the case of a downturn. They may in turn end up struggling if there is lack of fund access.
Lastly, in the case of an economic downturn, liquidity might end being the biggest issue that might need to be addressed. P2P lenders might extend the loan maturity or loans might be hard to access (King, 2010). This will greatly affect lenders that might want to diversify and extend their businesses. In the end, due to the liquidity issues, a downturn means that there will be lack of enough funds to withdraw or reinvest therefore affecting the entire p2p platform.
- How would you decide to incorporate such online/marketplace lending practices within a regulatory framework? Provide some practical recommendations.
There should be increase on the regulatory scrutiny in the online lending marketplace. . Recent concerns show that there lacks a compliance surveillance gap which leads to the increased attention on the regulators (Wack, 2015). Although online lenders often comply with the federal and state regulations, they rarely focus on regulatory litigations more so on their sublime lending practices and tax compliance standards. Regulatory framework will also help deal with compliance costs which erode the on the low margins through use of surveillance which will help highlight violations just in time.
This means that the client lending experience needs to be enhanced. Upton date, majority of the traditional lending institutions have been able to go into the online lending platform through partnerships. Recent partnerships include firms such as Santander’ s partnership with JPMorgan Chase & Co. ’ s with On Deck Kabbage partnering with Santander (PWC, 2015). This enhances the experience of online lending as the approval time and the work of accessing a consumer’s credit risk profile is minimized and also at the same time made effective.
An additional way of incorporating such online/marketplace lending practices within a regulatory framework is through consolidating. There exists more than 200 lenders in the online lending industry who are competition for the 1 percent market shares while banks and other financial institutions are competing for the remaining 99 percent of the market (PWC, 2015). Therefore, by consolidating and differentiating themselves by following in the regulatory framework the market can increase on the trust in the industry.
Retention by addressing the holistic financial needs of the clients (King, 2010). Majority of the traditional financial firms are entering the online market place through their current capabilities of lending. This means that three is room for other firms who don’t offer lending to succeed. Wealth managers and retirement providers can also do well through offering their holistic services mortgages and student loans can also increase retention as they have a longer and increased payout rate period. Online borrowers infect provide superior and better experience to their consumers through institutions as such which are within the regulatory framework (King, 2010).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion it is evident that online/marketplace platform offer a financial platform that link both borrowers and lenders who are looking for unsecured loans. Such online/marketplace platforms offer borrowers and lenders a platform can access and provide loans through an online platform in which their profiles can be viewed. Such platforms are different from banks as banks have specialized to act as an intercessor between the borrower and the saver. Moreover, banks requires capital all the time in order to absorb the losses that they acquire while for online/marketplace lending, they mainly rely on the amount that they charge for services. A downturn would negatively affect the system as there are no set regulations that govern the p2p system.
REFERENCES
Bouteille, S., & Coogan, D. (2013). The Handbook of Credit Risk Management: Originating, Assessing, and Managing Credit Exposures. Wiley Finance.
King, B. (2010). How Customer Behavior and Technology Will Change the Future of Financial Services. Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd.
Zhang, B., Baeck, P., Ziegler, T., Bone, J., & Garvey, K. (2016). Pushing Boundaries: the 2015 UK Alternative Finance Industry Report. Retrieved on 8th October 2017 from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/pushing_boundaries_0.pdf
Wack, K. (2015). Shift Away from Retail Investors Heightens Risks in Online Lending. American Banker. Retrieved on 8th October 2017 from http://www.americanbanker.com/news/marketplacelending/shift-away-from-retail-investors-heightens-risks-in-online-lending-1078534- 1.html
HM Treasury. (2014). Competition in banking: improving access to SME credit data – Consultations. Retrieved October 8, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/competition-in-banking-improvingaccess-to-sme-credit-data
PWC. (2015). Peer Pressure: How Peer to Peer Lending Platforms are Transforming Consumer Finance. Retrieved on 8th October 2017 from http://www.pwc.com/us/en/consumerfinance/publications/peer-to-peer-lending.html